<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Niagara Falls Web Sites: FallsAvenue.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://accessniagara.com/blog/2007/02/27/niagara-falls-web-sites-fallsavenuecom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://accessniagara.com/blog/2007/02/27/niagara-falls-web-sites-fallsavenuecom/</link>
	<description>All things Niagara Falls tourism...</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://accessniagara.com/blog/2007/02/27/niagara-falls-web-sites-fallsavenuecom/#comment-161300</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 05:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accessniagara.com/blog/index.php/2007/02/27/niagara-falls-web-sites-fallsavenuecom/#comment-161300</guid>
		<description>Graham, I've noticed the same things on past visits to their site.  I think they need to revamp their entire site and become more informative.

I really like the Clifton Hill website from HOCO.  It's organized, crisp, and informative.  Their hotel links also go outside the site to Choice Hotels when making a reservation.  IMO the Clifton Hill website is more well done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graham, I&#8217;ve noticed the same things on past visits to their site.  I think they need to revamp their entire site and become more informative.</p>
<p>I really like the Clifton Hill website from HOCO.  It&#8217;s organized, crisp, and informative.  Their hotel links also go outside the site to Choice Hotels when making a reservation.  IMO the Clifton Hill website is more well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
